Rename all references of sparcv9 to sparc64, to make Zig align more with
other projects. Also, added new function to convert glibc arch name to Zig
arch name, since it refers to the architecture as sparcv9.
This is based on the suggestion by @kubkon in PR 11847.
(https://github.com/ziglang/zig/pull/11487#pullrequestreview-963761757)
stage2: change logic for detecting whether the main package is inside
the std package. Previously it relied on realpath() which is not portable.
This uses resolve() which is how imports already work.
* stage2: fix cleanup bug when creating Module
* flatten lib/std/special/* to lib/*
- this was motivated by making main_pkg_is_inside_std false for
compiler_rt & friends.
* rename "mini libc" to "universal libc"
The reason for having `@tan` is that we already have `@sin` and `@cos`
because some targets have machine code instructions for them, but in the
case that the implementation needs to go into compiler-rt, sin, cos, and
tan all share a common dependency which includes a table of data. To
avoid duplicating this table of data, we promote tan to become a builtin
alongside sin and cos.
ZIR: The tag enum is at capacity so this commit moves
`field_call_bind_named` to be `extended`. I measured this as one of
the least used tags in the zig codebase.
Fix libc math suffix for `f32` being wrong in both stage1 and stage2.
stage1: add missing libc prefix for float functions.
For those souls looking for a zig `size_t` equivalent, and not
lucky/educated enough (that was me yesterday) to know it's the same as
`uintptr_t`.
From a recent discussion on IRC.
Two major changes here:
1. We store the CWD as a simple `[]const u8` and lookup Preopens for
every absolute or CWD-referenced file operation, based on the
Preopen with the longest match (i.e. most specific path)
2. Preorders are normalized to POSIX absolute paths at init time.
Behavior depends on the "cwd_root" parameter of `initPreopensWasi`:
`cwd_root` is used for any Preopens that start with "."
For example:
"./foo/bar" - inits to -> "{cwd_root}/foo/bar"
"foo/bar" - inits to -> "/foo/bar"
"/foo/bar" - inits to -> "/foo/bar"
`cwd_root` must be an absolute path.
Using "/" as `cwd_root` gives behavior similar to wasi-libc.
* make it always return a fully qualified name. stage1 is inconsistent
about this.
* AstGen: fix anon_name_strategy to correctly be `func` when anon type
creation happens in the operand of the return expression.
* Sema: implement type names for the "function" naming strategy.
* Put "enum", "union", "opaque", or "struct" in place of "anon" when
creating respective anonymous Decl names.
* std.testing: add `expectStringStartsWith`. Didn't end up using it
after all.
Also this enables the real test runner for stage2 LLVM backend (sans
wasm32) since it works now.
I hit the "quotes in an RSP file" issue when trying to compile gRPC using
"zig cc". As a fun exercise, I decided to see if I could fix it myself.
I'm fully open to this code being flat-out rejected. Or I can take feedback
to fix it up.
This modifies (and renames) _ArgIteratorWindows_ in process.zig such that
it works with arbitrary strings (or the contents of an RSP file).
In main.zig, this new _ArgIteratorGeneral_ is used to address the "TODO"
listed in _ClangArgIterator_.
This change closes#4833.
**Pros:**
- It has the nice attribute of handling "RSP file" arguments in the same way it
handles "cmd_line" arguments.
- High Performance, minimal allocations
- Fixed bug in previous _ArgIteratorWindows_, where final trailing backslashes
in a command line were entirely dropped
- Added a test case for the above bug
- Harmonized the _ArgIteratorXxxx._initWithAllocator()_ and _next()_ interface
across Windows/Posix/Wasi (Moved Windows errors to _initWithAllocator()_
rather than _next()_)
- Likely perf benefit on Windows by doing _utf16leToUtf8AllocZ()_ only once
for the entire cmd_line
**Cons:**
- Breaking Change in std library on Windows: Call
_ArgIterator.initWithAllocator()_ instead of _ArgIterator.init()_
- PhaseMage is new with contributions to Zig, might need a lot of hand-holding
- PhaseMage is a Windows person, non-Windows stuff will need to be double-checked
**Testing Done:**
- Wrote a few new test cases in process.zig
- zig.exe build test -Dskip-release (no new failures seen)
- zig cc now builds gRPC without error
* Create Vector language documentation
Main changes to docs:
1. Create brief documentation on Zig vector types with code example
2. Get rid of the SIMD sub-heading under the main Vectors heading,
and update links accordingly
3. Add an example to the `@shuffle` docs
`getExternalExecutor` is moved from `std.zig.CrossTarget` to
`std.zig.system.NativeTargetInfo.getExternalExecutor`.
The function also now communicates a bit more information about *why*
the host is unable to execute a binary. The CLI is updated to report
this information in a useful manner.
`getExternalExecutor` is also improved to detect such patterns as:
* x86_64 is able to execute x86 binaries
* aarch64 is able to execute arm binaries
* etc.
Added qemu-hexagon support to `getExternalExecutor`.
`std.Target.canExecBinaries` of is removed; callers should use the more
powerful `getExternalExecutor` instead.
Now that `zig test` tries to run the resulting binary no matter what,
this commit has a follow-up change to the build system and docgen to
utilize the `getExternalExecutor` function and pass `--test-no-exec`
in some cases to avoid getting the error.
Additionally:
* refactor: extract NativePaths and NativeTargetInfo into their own
files named after the structs.
* small improvement to langref to reduce the complexity of the `callconv`
expression in a couple examples.
Updates the Language Reference sections: Comments, Values, and Zig Test.
Zig Test section moved down with the goal "make sure it can be read top to
bottom sensibly" in mind (issue #1524).
Comments and Values section examples changed test declarations to a main
function and expect statement to print statements.
A print statement was added to the "String Literals and Unicode Code Point"
section's example to demonstrate the "u" format specifier.
Zig Test Section:
* Addresses the question: "How does the syntax work?".
* Partially answers the question: "What can I do with the zig test tool?" but
should be sufficient to understand the examples in all of this document.
* Addresses the question: "How does a top-level test block differ from a function definition?"
* Provides a example to run multiple test.
Lacks clear definitions of containers, top-level, order independence, lazy
analysis, resolve, reference.
GitHub Issues: #8221, #8234
