improve the error message and test coverage
This commit is contained in:
parent
bfe0bf695b
commit
96fd103073
|
@ -3024,7 +3024,7 @@ test "switch on tagged union" {
|
|||
// Switching on more complex enums is allowed.
|
||||
const b = switch (a) {
|
||||
// A capture group is allowed on a match, and will return the enum
|
||||
// value matched. If the payloads of both cases are the same
|
||||
// value matched. If the payload types of both cases are the same
|
||||
// they can be put into the same switch prong.
|
||||
Item.A, Item.E => |item| item,
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
77
src/ir.cpp
77
src/ir.cpp
|
@ -19229,53 +19229,52 @@ static IrInstruction *ir_analyze_instruction_switch_var(IrAnalyze *ira, IrInstru
|
|||
ZigType *enum_type = target_type->data.unionation.tag_type;
|
||||
assert(enum_type != nullptr);
|
||||
assert(enum_type->id == ZigTypeIdEnum);
|
||||
assert(instruction->prongs_len > 0);
|
||||
|
||||
IrInstruction *prong_value = instruction->prongs_ptr[0]->child;
|
||||
if (type_is_invalid(prong_value->value.type))
|
||||
IrInstruction *first_prong_value = instruction->prongs_ptr[0]->child;
|
||||
if (type_is_invalid(first_prong_value->value.type))
|
||||
return ira->codegen->invalid_instruction;
|
||||
|
||||
IrInstruction *casted_prong_value = ir_implicit_cast(ira, prong_value, enum_type);
|
||||
if (type_is_invalid(casted_prong_value->value.type))
|
||||
IrInstruction *first_casted_prong_value = ir_implicit_cast(ira, first_prong_value, enum_type);
|
||||
if (type_is_invalid(first_casted_prong_value->value.type))
|
||||
return ira->codegen->invalid_instruction;
|
||||
|
||||
ConstExprValue *prong_val = ir_resolve_const(ira, casted_prong_value, UndefBad);
|
||||
if (!prong_val)
|
||||
ConstExprValue *first_prong_val = ir_resolve_const(ira, first_casted_prong_value, UndefBad);
|
||||
if (first_prong_val == nullptr)
|
||||
return ira->codegen->invalid_instruction;
|
||||
|
||||
TypeUnionField *field = find_union_field_by_tag(target_type, &prong_val->data.x_enum_tag);
|
||||
TypeUnionField *first_field = find_union_field_by_tag(target_type, &first_prong_val->data.x_enum_tag);
|
||||
|
||||
if (instruction->prongs_len != 1) {
|
||||
ErrorMsg *invalid_payload = nullptr;
|
||||
Buf *invalid_payload_list = nullptr;
|
||||
ErrorMsg *invalid_payload_msg = nullptr;
|
||||
for (size_t prong_i = 1; prong_i < instruction->prongs_len; prong_i += 1) {
|
||||
IrInstruction *this_prong_inst = instruction->prongs_ptr[prong_i]->child;
|
||||
if (type_is_invalid(this_prong_inst->value.type))
|
||||
return ira->codegen->invalid_instruction;
|
||||
|
||||
for (size_t i = 1; i < instruction->prongs_len; i++) {
|
||||
IrInstruction *casted_prong_value = ir_implicit_cast(ira, instruction->prongs_ptr[i]->child, enum_type);
|
||||
if (type_is_invalid(casted_prong_value->value.type))
|
||||
return ira->codegen->invalid_instruction;
|
||||
|
||||
ConstExprValue *next_prong = ir_resolve_const(ira, casted_prong_value, UndefBad);
|
||||
if (!next_prong)
|
||||
return ira->codegen->invalid_instruction;
|
||||
IrInstruction *this_casted_prong_value = ir_implicit_cast(ira, this_prong_inst, enum_type);
|
||||
if (type_is_invalid(this_casted_prong_value->value.type))
|
||||
return ira->codegen->invalid_instruction;
|
||||
|
||||
ZigType *payload = find_union_field_by_tag(target_type, &next_prong->data.x_enum_tag)->type_entry;
|
||||
ConstExprValue *this_prong = ir_resolve_const(ira, this_casted_prong_value, UndefBad);
|
||||
if (this_prong == nullptr)
|
||||
return ira->codegen->invalid_instruction;
|
||||
|
||||
if (field->type_entry != payload) {
|
||||
if (!invalid_payload) {
|
||||
invalid_payload = ir_add_error(ira, &instruction->base,
|
||||
buf_sprintf("switch prong contains cases with different payloads"));
|
||||
invalid_payload_list = buf_sprintf("payload types are %s", buf_ptr(&field->type_entry->name));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (i == instruction->prongs_len - 1)
|
||||
buf_append_buf(invalid_payload_list, buf_sprintf(" and %s", buf_ptr(&payload->name)));
|
||||
else
|
||||
buf_append_buf(invalid_payload_list, buf_sprintf(", %s", buf_ptr(&payload->name)));
|
||||
TypeUnionField *payload_field = find_union_field_by_tag(target_type, &this_prong->data.x_enum_tag);
|
||||
ZigType *payload_type = payload_field->type_entry;
|
||||
if (first_field->type_entry != payload_type) {
|
||||
if (invalid_payload_msg == nullptr) {
|
||||
invalid_payload_msg = ir_add_error(ira, &instruction->base,
|
||||
buf_sprintf("capture group with incompatible types"));
|
||||
add_error_note(ira->codegen, invalid_payload_msg, first_prong_value->source_node,
|
||||
buf_sprintf("type '%s' here", buf_ptr(&first_field->type_entry->name)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
add_error_note(ira->codegen, invalid_payload_msg, this_prong_inst->source_node,
|
||||
buf_sprintf("type '%s' here", buf_ptr(&payload_field->type_entry->name)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (invalid_payload)
|
||||
add_error_note(ira->codegen, invalid_payload,
|
||||
((IrInstruction*)instruction)->source_node, invalid_payload_list);
|
||||
if (invalid_payload_msg != nullptr) {
|
||||
return ira->codegen->invalid_instruction;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (instr_is_comptime(target_value_ptr)) {
|
||||
|
@ -19288,7 +19287,7 @@ static IrInstruction *ir_analyze_instruction_switch_var(IrAnalyze *ira, IrInstru
|
|||
return ira->codegen->invalid_instruction;
|
||||
|
||||
IrInstruction *result = ir_const(ira, &instruction->base,
|
||||
get_pointer_to_type(ira->codegen, field->type_entry,
|
||||
get_pointer_to_type(ira->codegen, first_field->type_entry,
|
||||
target_val_ptr->type->data.pointer.is_const));
|
||||
ConstExprValue *out_val = &result->value;
|
||||
out_val->data.x_ptr.special = ConstPtrSpecialRef;
|
||||
|
@ -19298,8 +19297,8 @@ static IrInstruction *ir_analyze_instruction_switch_var(IrAnalyze *ira, IrInstru
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
IrInstruction *result = ir_build_union_field_ptr(&ira->new_irb,
|
||||
instruction->base.scope, instruction->base.source_node, target_value_ptr, field, false, false);
|
||||
result->value.type = get_pointer_to_type(ira->codegen, field->type_entry,
|
||||
instruction->base.scope, instruction->base.source_node, target_value_ptr, first_field, false, false);
|
||||
result->value.type = get_pointer_to_type(ira->codegen, first_field->type_entry,
|
||||
target_value_ptr->value.type->data.pointer.is_const);
|
||||
return result;
|
||||
} else if (target_type->id == ZigTypeIdErrorSet) {
|
||||
|
@ -23007,11 +23006,11 @@ static IrInstruction *ir_analyze_instruction_mul_add(IrAnalyze *ira, IrInstructi
|
|||
IrInstruction *type_value = instruction->type_value->child;
|
||||
if (type_is_invalid(type_value->value.type))
|
||||
return ira->codegen->invalid_instruction;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
ZigType *expr_type = ir_resolve_type(ira, type_value);
|
||||
if (type_is_invalid(expr_type))
|
||||
return ira->codegen->invalid_instruction;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// Only allow float types, and vectors of floats.
|
||||
ZigType *float_type = (expr_type->id == ZigTypeIdVector) ? expr_type->data.vector.elem_type : expr_type;
|
||||
if (float_type->id != ZigTypeIdFloat) {
|
||||
|
@ -25112,7 +25111,7 @@ static IrInstruction *ir_analyze_instruction_float_op(IrAnalyze *ira, IrInstruct
|
|||
IrInstruction *type = instruction->type->child;
|
||||
if (type_is_invalid(type->value.type))
|
||||
return ira->codegen->invalid_instruction;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
ZigType *expr_type = ir_resolve_type(ira, type);
|
||||
if (type_is_invalid(expr_type))
|
||||
return ira->codegen->invalid_instruction;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -2,6 +2,24 @@ const tests = @import("tests.zig");
|
|||
const builtin = @import("builtin");
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn addCases(cases: *tests.CompileErrorContext) void {
|
||||
cases.add(
|
||||
"capture group on switch prong with incompatible payload types",
|
||||
\\const Union = union(enum) {
|
||||
\\ A: usize,
|
||||
\\ B: isize,
|
||||
\\};
|
||||
\\comptime {
|
||||
\\ var u = Union{ .A = 8 };
|
||||
\\ switch (u) {
|
||||
\\ .A, .B => |e| unreachable,
|
||||
\\ }
|
||||
\\}
|
||||
,
|
||||
"tmp.zig:8:20: error: capture group with incompatible types",
|
||||
"tmp.zig:8:9: note: type 'usize' here",
|
||||
"tmp.zig:8:13: note: type 'isize' here",
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
cases.add(
|
||||
"wrong type to @hasField",
|
||||
\\export fn entry() bool {
|
||||
|
@ -6073,21 +6091,4 @@ pub fn addCases(cases: *tests.CompileErrorContext) void {
|
|||
"tmp.zig:5:30: error: expression value is ignored",
|
||||
"tmp.zig:9:30: error: expression value is ignored",
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
cases.add(
|
||||
"capture group on switch prong with different payloads",
|
||||
\\const Union = union(enum) {
|
||||
\\ A: usize,
|
||||
\\ B: isize,
|
||||
\\};
|
||||
\\comptime {
|
||||
\\ var u = Union{ .A = 8 };
|
||||
\\ switch (u) {
|
||||
\\ .A, .B => |e| unreachable,
|
||||
\\ }
|
||||
\\}
|
||||
,
|
||||
"tmp.zig:8:20: error: switch prong contains cases with different payloads",
|
||||
"tmp.zig:8:20: note: payload types are usize and isize",
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -392,20 +392,36 @@ test "switch with null and T peer types and inferred result location type" {
|
|||
comptime S.doTheTest(1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
test "switch prongs with cases with identical payloads" {
|
||||
test "switch prongs with cases with identical payload types" {
|
||||
const Union = union(enum) {
|
||||
A: usize,
|
||||
B: isize,
|
||||
C: usize,
|
||||
};
|
||||
const S = struct {
|
||||
fn doTheTest(u: Union) void {
|
||||
fn doTheTest() void {
|
||||
doTheSwitch1(Union{ .A = 8 });
|
||||
doTheSwitch2(Union{ .B = -8 });
|
||||
}
|
||||
fn doTheSwitch1(u: Union) void {
|
||||
switch (u) {
|
||||
.A, .C => |e| expect(@typeOf(e) == usize),
|
||||
.B => |e| expect(@typeOf(e) == isize),
|
||||
.A, .C => |e| {
|
||||
expect(@typeOf(e) == usize);
|
||||
expect(e == 8);
|
||||
},
|
||||
.B => |e| @panic("fail"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
fn doTheSwitch2(u: Union) void {
|
||||
switch (u) {
|
||||
.A, .C => |e| @panic("fail"),
|
||||
.B => |e| {
|
||||
expect(@typeOf(e) == isize);
|
||||
expect(e == -8);
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
S.doTheTest(Union{ .A = 8 });
|
||||
comptime S.doTheTest(Union{ .B = -8 });
|
||||
S.doTheTest();
|
||||
comptime S.doTheTest();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user